Monday Letters: Teitler, Kuhlenberg for the school board; yes on 5B; not out of 78; bald eagles

0

Election of Kenny Teitler

We are writing to support Kenny Teitler in the upcoming RFSD School Board election. Our two sons (now in their 30s) attended schools in the Roaring Fork School District in Basalt from Kindergarten to Grade 12. They were fortunate to have many amazing teachers, but both would agree that one of the best was Kenny Teitler. Kenny created the bilingual program at Basalt Elementary School.

Dan and Andy were both in his class, and we occasionally sat down as parent volunteers. We saw this talented instructor keep the kids interested and focused on their task while switching between English and Spanish, often in the middle of a sentence. He always had creative and fun lesson plans and could help students of all learning levels progress. He communicated well with parents and appreciated their contribution. He clearly knew and cared about every child in his class.



We have observed Kenny’s continued passion for children and student achievement over the years, including during Mary’s years in parent engagement groups and Pete’s years as a member of the RFSD School Board. Kenny studies the data, has a clear understanding of the school system, and lots of great ideas on how to improve the learning environment. The point of view of such a caring and experienced teacher would be a great asset to the school board.

We hope our community across the valley will vote to elect Kenny – a vote for intelligence, creativity, school experience, and most importantly, kindness.



Pete and Mary Delany

Basalt

Kuhlenberg for the school board

Kadi Kuhlenberg has the experience, passion and dedication we need to drive strategic initiatives. She has focused her life and career on education.

She has extensive experience in education and extensive professional experience related to education, education policy, employment, finance and children which would make her the right board member. administration at the right time. Kadi has undergraduate degrees in education policy and child psychology and a law degree with specialties in education policy and civil rights.

It focuses on improving communication within the district, attracting and retaining education professionals, resolving the budget crisis, and expanding early childhood education.

If you would like to learn more about Kathryn and her vision, please visit Facebook.com/KKforRFSDSchoolBoard.

Kathleen wanatowicz

Carbondale

Watch out for the bald eagle

Thanks for writing about bald eagles in Garfield County. Although I reside in Florida, my ancestral family is from Glenwood Springs.

In Florida, I spent 20 years observing bald eagles in the wild and in wild cityscapes. During the delisting, I saw the historical territories of the bald eagle change, some with and some without buffers. Bald eagles are big birds – they need a lot of space, and they relocate nesting sites for all kinds of reasons. What they need is the areas along the river to be protected. Not just the old territory, but the new one, and everything in between. New trees can grow. Protecting alternative nesting sites is as essential as protecting active nesting sites. Otherwise, the native territories disappear, one by one, until the eagles nest in the cell phone towers. The entire territory in question should be managed for the bald eagle in perpetuity. It means taking care of the water, the native plants, the prey base.

I fully understand the position of the USFWS. It is a growth strategy. The tree is gone, the eagles are gone, so why protect it? Because eagles move. The tree they are in could also fall. Other wild animals sometimes take eagles’ nests, so the eagles have to build another nest. The habitat must support this in the long term. Garfield County Eagles are genetic survivors, and the young they produce should have room for expansion as well. It means buffering the river.

I urge Garfield County Commissioners, landowners and all residents to manage the land for all wildlife in a responsible, conscientious and respectful manner. But above all, protect the river and the trees and the land for the bald eagles.

Barbara walker

Palm Harbor, Florida

No on amendment 78

In this year’s election, one initiative we are being asked to decide on is Amendment 78, the Appropriations Initiative for Child Care Funds. Trust funds are government revenues that are not generated by taxes. Trust funds come from federal grants, pension funds and court approved settlement funds. There is currently a lawsuit to remove the question from the ballot or not to count the votes.

Under Colorado law, initiatives in odd-numbered election years must be tied to TABOR, the Taxpayer Bill of Rights. TABOR oversees tax changes. It is legally debatable whether deposit funds even fall under TABOR guidelines; thus, the lawsuit calling into question the placement of the initiative on the ballot paper during an election outside the year.

Amendment 78 seeks to strengthen accountability in how these funds are spent; on the surface, a laudable goal. However, for hunting and angling sportsmen, there is a serious unintended consequence; the $ 25 million Colorado receives annually from the U.S. Dingell Fish and Wildlife Service-

The Johnson and Pittman-Robertson excise taxes are in jeopardy if this initiative is successful. Placing the Dingell-Johnson and Pittman-Robertson funds in a special account supervised by the Legislature directly contradicts federal guidelines on how these funds can be supervised and spent. The Colorado Department of Parks and Wildlife has previously followed these guidelines with the federal government. The introduction of an additional approval process muddies the waters, slows the disbursement of these funds and, if there is too much delay, the funds are completely lost to the state; they are transferred to the Migratory Birds Conservation Act.

While accountability for how state dollars are spent is a laudable goal, this initiative does not achieve that goal without compromising this specific funding for conservation, funding that is self-taxation paid by athletes. . We sportsmen deserve our funds to be spent on wildlife conservation, the very reason these excise taxes were created. CPW has a proven track record of spending these funds annually. Let’s leave it to them, not to a committee.

Vote no on Amendment 78.

Bob shettel

Carbondale

Votes for our local schools

Our son was quite nervous about his first day in high school in Basalt this year. But from day one his experience has been great, with committed teachers and staff, a well-run program, access to great lessons, and incredible sports and club opportunities.

We are fortunate to have great leadership in the Roaring Fork School District – from the principal to our principals and staff. And to continue this progress, we are going to do two things. First, we vote for Kenny Teitler and Kathryn Kuhlenberg for the RFSD school board. Kenny and Kathryn have years of local education experience. They both bring intelligence, commitment to service, and the ability to build relationships and make tough decisions that will prove invaluable to the school board.

Second, we’ll be voting an enthusiastic “yes” on ballot 5B (the mail-in ballots are now in your box). 5B will help resolve RFSD’s staffing crisis by allowing the district to pay enough teachers to compete with neighboring school districts that may pay their teachers more and / or where the cost of living is lower. We believe that an investment in our local schools helps ensure that we continue to live in a great community, long after our children have graduated from high school.

Ellen Freedman and Auden Schendler

Basalt


Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.